DRAFT PUBLIC PROCUREMENT
REGULATIONS
FOR PROCUREMENT OF CONSULTANCY SERVICES S.R.O.
.- In
exercise of powers conferred by section 27 of the Public Procurement Regulatory
Authority Ordinance, 2002 (XXII of 2002), the Public Procurement Authority is
pleased to make the following regulations namely:- 1. Short title and commencement.- (1) These regulations may be called the Public Procurement Regulations for Procurement of Consultancy Services (2)
They shall come into force one month after the notification date. GENERAL PROVISIONS
2.
Definitions.-
(1) In these regulations, unless there is anything repugnant in the
subject or context:- (a)
“bidding” means the formal procurement procedure under which sealed
bids are invited, received, opened, examined and evaluated for the purpose of
awarding a contract; (b)
“Committee” means the Consultant Selection Committee of the procuring
agency; (c)
“Consultant” means an individual consultant or a consulting firm as
the case may be; (d)
“Consulting services” means the provision of independent expert
advice of a quality at least equal to the applicable professional standards in
relation to acquisition of goods, services (other than Consulting Services) and
works; (e)
“Request for proposal (RFP)” means set of bidding documents sent to
short listed Consultants and includes at least:- (i)
letter of invitation; (ii)
instructions to Consultants; (iii)
terms of reference; (iv)
evaluation criteria; and (v)
the proposed contract. (f)
“Terms of reference” means defining and elaborating on the objectives
and intended scope of services at the time of invitation of proposals. (2)
The expressions used but not defined in these regulations shall have the
same meanings as are assigned to them in the Public Procurement Regulatory
Authority Ordinance, 2002 and Public Procurement Rules, 2004. 3.
Systems for selection of Consultants.- The selection system shall
be determined by the procuring agency prior to issuance of the request for
proposals from prospective Consultants. A procuring agency may utilize one of
the following systems for selection of Consultants, namely:- (a)
Quality based selection (QBS).-
This system will be used for highly specialized and complex assignments, where
quality is the only factor taken into consideration. (b)
Quality and cost based selection (QCBS).-
This system will be used where high quality is the prime consideration while
cost is a secondary consideration. (c)
Least cost.- This system will only be used
for assignments of standard or routine nature, where well established practices
and standards exist. (d)
Single source/direct selection.-
This method will be used only in exceptional cases, where it provides clear
advantage over competition such as:- (i)
for tasks which are natural continuation of previous assignment and where
continuity of technical services is required; (ii)
for very small assignments; (iii)
in cases of emergency; and (iv)
where only one Consultant is qualified or has experience of exceptional
worth. (e)
Fixed budget.- This system shall be used
only when the assignment is simple, can be precisely defined and when the budget
is fixed. The request for proposals shall indicate the available budget.
Proposals that exceed the indicated budget shall be rejected. The ranking shall
be based only on evaluation of technical proposals of the qualified bidders. 4.
Criteria for eligibility of Consultants.- The procuring agency shall not
hire a Consultant for an assignment in which there is possibility of conflict of
interest. If a Consultant has been engaged by the procuring agency to provide
goods or works for a project, it shall be disqualified from providing Consulting
services for the same project. Similarly, Consultant should not be hired for any
assignment which by its nature, may be in conflict with another assignment of
the Consultant. 5.
Expression of interest (EOI).- (1) A request for EOI shall be
advertised giving applicants at least two weeks for national competition and
four weeks for international competition to submit their interest to provide
consultancy services. (2)
The EOI shall contain at least the following information:- (a)
the
name and address of procuring agency; (b)
an
appropriate description of the assignment providing scope of the
intellectual and professional services required; (c)
deadline
and place of the submission of the EOIs; and (d)
criteria
for short listing or prequalification where required. 6.
Criteria for short-listing of Consultants.- (1) Whenever short-listing is
deemed necessary, the procuring agency shall predetermine a criteria for short
listing. Except for single source, there will normally be a minimum of three
Consultants in the shortlist, but there is no upper limit for number of
candidates to be short listed. However, if less than three candidates apply,
their proposals may be considered on merit. (2)
The procuring agency while engaged in short listing of Consultants will
take into consideration the following factors, namely:- i)
Qualification; ii)
Experience; and iii)
Any other factor that a procuring agency may deem
relevant, not inconsistent with these regulations
or Public Procurement Rules, 2004. (3)
All applicants shall be informed whether or not they have been
short-listed. 7.
Criteria for prequalification of Consultants.- (1) Whether short-listing is done or not, the
procuring agency may engage in prequalification of Consultants in case of
complex assignments. (2)
The procuring agency while engaged in prequalification of Consultants
will take into consideration the following factors, namely:-
(i)
Qualification;
(ii)
General experience;
(iii) Specific
experience; and
iv)
Any other factor that a procuring agency may deem relevant, not
inconsistent with these regulations or Public Procurement Rules, 2004. (3)
Prequalification of Consultants, where required, shall be processed in
accordance with Rule 16 of Public Procurement Rules, 2004. 8.
Request for proposals (RFP).- (1) The procuring agency shall use
an RFP for seeking proposals from the Consultants which shall include the
following, namely:- (a)
Letter of invitation (LOI).- The LOI shall mention the name and
address of the procuring agency and shall state the intention of the procuring
agency to enter into a contract for provision of Consulting services. (b)
Instruction to Consultants.- The instructions to Consultants shall
contain all necessary information that would help them prepare responsive
proposals and shall bring as much transparency as possible to the selection
system. (c)
Terms of reference (TOR).- TOR shall unambiguously define the
objectives, goals and scope of the assignment besides conditions of contract.
TOR shall list the services and surveys necessary to carry out the assignment
and expected outputs. (d)
Evaluation criteria.- Except as otherwise provided, the evaluation
of proposals shall be carried out giving due consideration to quality and cost. (e)
Type of contract.- The procuring agency, depending on the
circumstances, may use one of the following types of contract, namely:- (i)
Lump sum contract will be used mainly for
assignments in which the content, duration of the services and the required
output are unambiguously defined; (ii)
Time based contract will be used when it is
difficult to define the scope and the length of services; (iii)
Hourly or daily rates will be used for small
projects, especially when the assignment is for less than a month; and (iv)
Any other, based on combination of the above and
including out of pocket expenses, where required. (f)
Special provisions.- The procuring agency may specify any other
requirement related to the assignment or contract etc where required. (2)
The procuring agency will invite the prospective Consultants to submit
their technical and financial proposals in separately sealed envelopes. The
procuring agency shall give deadline for submission of proposals. Consultants
shall be given adequate time in which to prepare their proposals which shall not
be less than four weeks. 9.
Selection committee.- (1) The procuring agency shall appoint only
one Committee for short listing or prequalification and selection of Consultant.
The Committee shall comprise of at least three competent persons from amongst
different wings of the organization e.g. planning/design, audit/account,
purchase/store, construction/operation etc. (2)
The Committee shall advise on short listing and prequalification of
consultants. (3)
Except for single source selection, the Committee shall evaluate the RFPs
in accordance with Rule 36(b) of the Public Procurement Rules, 2004. (4)
The bidder whose technical and financial proposal is the most
advantageous shall be ranked highest and his bid shall be treated as lowest
evaluated bid. 10.
Extent of negotiation.- The Committee of the procuring agency may
negotiate with the highest ranked bidder regarding methodology, work plan,
staffing and special conditions of the contract. The Committee shall not permit
substitution of key staff, unless both parties agree that undue delay in
selection process makes such substitution unavoidable. Similarly, negotiations
shall not seek changes in the rates quoted by the bidder. In case of failure of
negotiations, the Committee may invite the next ranked bidder. Negotiations by a
single person Committee shall never be allowed. 11.
Professional liability of Consultants.- (1) The Consultant selected
and awarded a contract shall be liable for consequence of errors or omissions on
its part. The extent of liability of the Consultant should be incorporated in
the contract and in no case should it be less than remunerations excluding the
out of pocket expenses, nor should the liability exceed twice the remunerations. (2)
The procuring agency may demand insurance on part of the Consultant to
cover its liability as stated above, and necessary costs shall be borne by the
Consultant which shall be reimbursed by the procuring agency as out of pocket
expenses by the Consultant. (3)
The
Consultant shall be held liable for all losses or damages suffered by the
procuring agency on account of any misconduct by the Consultant in performing
the consulting services. 12.
Precedence.-
The Public Procurement Rules, 2004 and these
regulations are to be taken as mutually explanatory of one another but in
case of discrepancy, the regulations
shall take precedence over the Public Procurement Rules, 2004. |